Skip to content

The rule, exactly. Before an election each citizen chooses: to vote — or to take a payment and not vote in that election. The payment is a percentage of the median income, set by referendum; there is no fixed sum. One ballot is one vote, with no multiplier in the count; the vote is amplified only in that each ballot's share grows as others step out. The budget pays under law; a candidate never pays. Only a referendum of all citizens — simple majority, no quorum — introduces, changes or repeals the rule.

The protocol has been introduced nowhere and no pilot has been run: shares, turnout and outcome figures in the chapters are estimates, and the protocol promises nobody an election victory. If a chapter says otherwise, Exact Answers and the Charter are correct. For a candidate: ten questions and ten steps. For a citizen, a mayor, a finance officer, a donor, a journalist, a scholar, a lawyer: answers by role. Everything in force in one file: llms-full.txt.

57. 🌍 Additional countries (Poland, Czechia, Taiwan)

Chapter: 09 — Other countries Status: 🆕 Todo — placeholder, needs writing File version: v1 Date: 2026-06-11

Contents of the section (to be written by Claude in chat)

This section requires writing in later sessions. The structure should cover:

  • Localising the formula to the local economy (median wage → dividend)
  • Analysis of the legal route (parliamentary route vs citizen initiative)
  • Strategic advantages and obstacles
  • Specific pilot regions or launch schemes
  • Connection to the local political context
  • Ready-made wordings in the local language
  • §5 — The fifth class of relations (the general conceptual frame)
  • §11 — The paradigm from duty to choice (for emotional communication)
  • §23 — Quantitative comparison (orders of magnitude of the effect)
  • §47 — State-by-state USA (methodology for choosing pilot regions)

Placeholder created 2026-06-11. To be replaced by full text from Claude in chat.